Reductionalism
Today I finished Philip Yancey’s book, “Disappointment with God.” I have discovered an unexpected appreciation for Yancey. I didn’t realize he was so honest and real with his writing. I wasn’t expecting such a real-life, and sometimes, dare I say it, confused, perspective, but just another feely good Christian book.
One thing Yancey talked about was reductionism in relation to faith. He talked about how in our modern world, we are typically hostile to “faith.” I know this to be true in my own life at times, and in the lives of close friends. He mentioned that other societies took for granted the existence of a supernatural world because the phenomena of the natural world seemed to point to powers beyond our comprehension - a sunset, an eclipse, a thunderstorm. But he talked about how in this current age, we are able to break everything down, from a rainbow, to human DNA and synapses, to atoms, reflection, refraction, etc. This has definite beneficial and positive outcomes, from curing diseases, to predicting weather-related catastrophes. Not to mention flights to the moon, and the ability to view the entire world while staring at a box in our living room.
“But reductionism has also brought a curse. Looking at the beam rather than along it (Yancey’s metaphor for viewing the parts rather than what they are leading to = something beyond us), we risk reducing life to nothing more than its constituent parts. We will never again view the sunrise or moonrise with the same sense of awe and near-worship that our “primitive” ancestors - or even the sixteenth-century poets - felt. And if we reduce behavior to merely hormones and chemistry, we lose all human mystery and free will and romance. The ideals of romantic love that have inspired artists and lovers through the centuries suddenly reduce to a matter of hormonal secretions.”
“Reductionism may exert undue influence over us unless we recognize it for what it is: a way of looking. It is not a True or False concept; it is a point of view that informs us about the parts of a thing, but not the whole.”





